WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court ruled Thursday that authorities do not have to provide a quick hearing when they seize cars and other property used in drug crimes, even when the property belongs to so-called innocent owners.
By a 6-3 vote, the justices rejected the claims of two Alabama women who had to wait more than a year for their cars to be returned. Police had stopped the cars when they were being driven by other people and, after finding drugs, seized the vehicles.
Civil forfeiture allows authorities to take someone’s property, without having to prove that it has been used for illicit purposes. Critics of the practice describe it as “legalized theft.”
Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote for the conservative majority that a civil forfeiture hearing to determine whether an owner will lose the property permanently must be timely. But he said the Constitution does not also require a separate hearing about whether police may keep cars or other property in the meantime.
Related articles:
Related suggestion:
China's cruise ship passenger trips soar in Q1Tom Brady teases Bill Belichick for infamous Ring doorbell footage of former Patriots coachLando Norris' model girlfriend keeps quiet over his Miami Grand Prix F1 win... as exFrom Marseille to MontBeyonce puts on a cheeky display in bottomChris Hemsworth is 'handpicked' by Vogue editor Anna Wintour to coTogo's presidents signs a law expected to extend his decadesFBI lays out detailed case against Florida man accused in wife's disappearance in SpainEmily Ratajkowski takes a fashion risk in a ripped midriffGerard Butler appears in high spirits as he watches Chelsea FC thrash West Ham 5
2.7918s , 6500.9296875 kb
Copyright © 2024 Powered by Divided Supreme Court rules no quick hearing required when police seize property ,Stellar Spotlight news portal